一位Oracle CRM Expert在C3CRM's Blog上的评论
周四, 2006-03-16 04:59 — Anonymous
dfar2008:I was going todfar2008: Kansas
周四, 2006-03-16 15:26 — Anonymous
不太适合call-senter用2] The software is more like J. D. Edwards application. So, it may be a good fit for a sales department or manufacture, but not a CRM system for customer service, such as call-center. 我也有这个看法,好像是给销售公司用,不能给一般的企业做客户关系管理
周四, 2006-03-16 05:45 — dfar2008 (没有被验证)
kansas,reply is here我的回复在上次您发表评论的文章下面,地址:http://blog.c3crm.com/?q=node/106#comment-144 大家还是比较关注的。 期待您的评论!
周五, 2006-03-17 08:56 — kansas
hope this one is easy to read!The beauty of software is on its engineering side. That is why I like programming so much, and ended up as an engineer. Let’s stay away from general topic about CRM, and do a case analysis/brain storm. This may bring us closer. I have search word of CRM in http://www.baidu.com tonight, and I saw tons of CRM application available for sale. By looking at demo in few websites. I have a feeling that most of those software are used by salesman for pre-sales activity, and there is no emphasize on post-sales which happen to be the main focus of CRM [CustomerRelationshipManagement] application in the West. Let's take SuperCRM3.5 [http://www.huaertek.com/huaertek/chinese/crm4.asp] as an example. By a careful review of its 基本功能 , I saw it focus on the 销售自动化包括客户档案管理,联系人管理,商机管理,商业活动管理,向导式的自动报价系统,合同生成和管理系统,订单处理系统,费用管理,员工绩效,统计分析系统等模块组成。 Indeed, this is a basically 销售自动化 software application. [How is my copy&paste skill?! Hahaha... say something good! … wink wink] The modern business world is characterized by its strong emphasis on post-sales service. This is why when IT industry flourished due to the rapid development of computer science, the service oriented CRM application has being embraced by the business community immediately. Now, case study: Now, Mr. Wang made a smart move to search for an application fit his business model. The following listed features of a CRM application can provide good service to residents who buy gas: It should contain: Now, let's see if city resident Mrs. Zhang bought an apartment that has gas stove. She picked up the phone ordering the service. Ms. XX001, the customer Representative from Mr. Wang’s company, answered the phone call while logging into the SugarCRM application[Background action#1]. Ms. XX001 key in the following information of Mrs. Zhang: address [Background action#2], last name, first name, and ID number [Background action#3]. The preferred billing method [Background action#4]. Since Mrs. Zhang wants to order a special cook top, Ms. XX001 also selected the item from the company product name list [Background action#5]. If everything is smooth, she completes the transaction, and gives Mr. Zhang the confirmation number for the order [Background action#6]. OK, let's see what SugarCRM has been doing in the background: Assuming in the next day, the product department dropped the shipment in the post office, and entered the info into the SugarCRM. Then, system automatically generated email/mail to Mrs. Zhang. And few days later, the service department installed the equipment, and turned on the switch. Of course, this information also gets into SugarCRM. And exactly one month after Mrs. Zhang has her gas pipeline turned on, she will receive a monthly bill. That means billing engine working and posted the charge on her account. If city construction work disrupts the pipeline, field workers will do inspection/repair, and give a feedback to the SugarCRM. Then, system will send out apology letter to the customers in the neighborhood. If Mrs. Zhang has questions about her bill, Customer Rep will be able to open her account in SugarCRM and explain the billing history to her, or make the adjustment. To the front-end user, all those transaction/operation is nice and easy! However, the back-end program is much more complicated. CRM has to hook up with Billing system, Order management system, service provisioning system, etc… without access those info in real time, the quality of service will be compromised. Some features seem not CRM related, such as secure connection with 3rd party company. But we have to take it into consideration while designing the system architecture. While… Let’s take the action#1 as an example. One may say "why do we need a radius server? We only have 50 employees". While.. .. While .. .. How long does a utility company stay in business? 10 years? 20 years? In todays free labor market, nobody can expect 50 employees will all stay on the same job for more than 5 years. Should we delete all those inactive employee accounts, realistic answer is NO! Within 5 years time frame a 50 employees company may ends up with 500 user account, active and inactive. An architect must be able to predict or forecast the system load 5 years down the road. Also, how about if company wants to launch online service to customers? so that, customers can access his/her account through web, instead of calling customer Rep .. .. And how about those complicated privilege, role, permission, etc.. .. It is better to have a separate module. …… [it is getting late….. ]
周五, 2006-03-17 17:38 — kansas
Sorry, I did not see your post on the original threadRe:Before we discuss the Sorry, I did not see your post until this morning…… Also,
周日, 2006-03-19 04:59 — kansas
To dfar2008周末休息,用家里的电脑给你发送一些信息. Welcome to the PeopleBooks Library Using PeopleSoft Applications ************************************************ PeopleSoft 8.8 CRM Sales PeopleBook *****************************************
周三, 2006-03-22 15:17 — dfar2008
to kansas你写的这几个评论我看了好几遍,一直没给你回复,是在等我们的3.0开发版的demo发布,今天终于出来了,但还在改善和开发中。 http://ohpacking.biz/c3crm/index.php admin/admin will/will 首先你先看一下我在blog上转发的C3CRM产品顾问小组里chiction写的有关国内企业的有关情况。 然后我对你以上评论谈一下我的看法。 你看到的C3CRM可能现在来说是比较General,但是由于我们做C3CRM不是很久,很多基本功能还没完善,我打算近期完善这些基本功能,然后再专注于某几个行业提供特殊版本,因为基本功能做好了,扩展也比较容易,效率也会比较高。 国内中小企业的信息化状况基本上是chiction所讲的,可能与你所想象中的不太一样,如果拿PeopleSoft的CRM来满足这些企业,这些企业肯定承受不了Oracle的价格,一个Oracle的License费用就比较贵(今天看到sony购买Oracle的License费用是4万美金/CPU/年)。所以国内企业目前所需要的是大而全但不是特别复杂的系统,而且价格也不要太高,现在国内的CRM竞争比较激烈,一个CRM几百元都卖的,你所说的SuperCRM就是不到1000元,尽管做的不咋地,功能不是很强,但是他们的销售额还不错。现在Salesforce在国外做的比较火,在国内已开展业务,但是做的不怎么好,价格偏高(5000-10000元/用户/年)是比较重要的原因,尽管国内很多企业不原意把客户数据放在Salesforce的服务器上。所以说如果有好的开源CRM,国内企业会选择它的。 现在Sourceforge上流行的开源ERP-CRM:Compiere做的还不错,国内有不少合作伙伴,很多企业购买了他们文档、语言包和服务等。(有个Compiere的合作伙伴刚加入了C3CRM产品顾问小组) 尽管我觉得我们有必要提供special service,这样才能生存,并避免与大企业竞争,但是我还是想把C3CRM做成一个易扩展的平台,每个企业都可以根据自己的需求去扩展它,最好的情况不懂技术的人都可以根据自己的需求去扩展C3CRM,虽然达到这样的目标有点难度,但是这是我追求的目标,为国内的中小企业在CRM方面提供一个好的选择,不能总是让国外的公司把握我们的信息命脉。 IT界是一个充满幻想的领域,最近zimbra(一家用Ajax技术开发在线邮件系统的公司),对外宣布获得了1600万美金的投资,要挑战微软的outlook。http://www.zimbra.com 关于你在Case Study最后一段所谈的,我缺乏这方面的考虑,希望能多向你请教。
周一, 2006-03-27 16:36 — kansas
To dfar2008I have read chiction对中小企业需求的总结 several times over the weekend. Due to the fact that I have been living here for the past 16 years, I guess I am completely off in touch of reality with IT industry of China .. And the worst of all, I was not in IT field when I was back at home, so, I never had chance to talk to anyone in IT industry when I went home last year .. .. |

最新评论
7 weeks 6 days 前
8 weeks 9 hours 前
9 weeks 4 days 前
9 weeks 6 days 前
13 weeks 16 hours 前
13 weeks 1 day 前
15 weeks 10 hours 前
15 weeks 17 hours 前
21 weeks 1 day 前
22 weeks 15 hours 前